Rendleman v. Clarke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant had notice of defect and an opportunity to rebrief when the appellee pointed out the defect and the appellant subsequently failed to rebrief
• applying this general rule to an independent contractor on a construction site
• applying this general rule to an independent contractor on a construction site
• determining “the evidence did not raise a cause of action based on premises liability” because “appellant’s duty did not arise from a matter of legal relationship, but from the duty of ordinary care at common law”
• deeming the appellant’s sufficiency issue waived because the appellant failed to cite to the record; declining to exercise discretion to allow rebriefing because the appellant failed to rebrief during the seven months since the appellee’s brief had been filed
• deeming the appellant’s sufficiency issue waived because the appellant failed to cite to the record; declining to exercise discretion to allow rebriefing because the appellant failed to rebrief during the seven months since the appellee’s brief had been filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).