Skip to main content
· 9/14/2005

Renderos v. State

Citations

  • 213 S.W.3d 37
  • 92 Ark. App. 293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting Renderos's argument \that the statute should be read ... as to require that inducement be expressed verbally where there is evidence of unambiguous nonverbal inducement\
  • relying on the definition of “solicit” used in Heape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John Mauzy Pittman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.