Rendelman v. Wampler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]f a defendant can demonstrate that there is no reasonable expectation that the allegedly unlawful conduct will recur, the claim may be moot”
• recognizing that an unambiguous representation by an agency official would be entitled to presumption of regularity and could satisfy burden for voluntary cessation purposes
• holding that only “[i]f a defendant can demonstrate that there is no reasonable expectation that the allegedly unlawful conduct will recur” may a claim be moot
• governmental department’s statement of intent to change lacked necessary precision to conclude that its voluntary ces- sation mooted the case
• governmental department’s statement of intent to change lacked necessary precision to conclude that its voluntary ces- sation mooted the case
• analyzing only whether the challenged practice will happen again

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).