Rendelman v. Rouse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, as an exercise of Congress’s spending clause authority, RLUIPA does not authorize claims for monetary damages against state officials in their individual capacities
• concluding that, as an exercise of Congress’s spending clause authority, RLUIPA failed to authorize claims for monetary damages against state officials in their individual capacities
• holding that RLUIPA does not authorize a claim for money damages against an individual sued in his individual capacity
• holding that an inmate’s transfer to federal custody rendered moot his claim for injunctive relief under RLUIPA
• concluding that RLUIPA does not authorize a claim for money damages against a state employee sued in his individual capacity
• holding that, “as a general rule, a prisoner’s transfer or release from a particular prison moots his claims for injunctive and declaratory relief with respect to his incarceration there”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).