Skip to main content
· 9/29/2004

Renda Marine, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 62 Fed. Cl. 371
  • 2004 U.S. Claims LEXIS 261
  • 2004 WL 2267195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • under Ohio law, integration questions must be determined from the four corners of the document itself
  • there must be evidence that the contract was made and entered into with the intent to benefit the third- party, and not simply that some incidental benefit was conferred on an unrelated party by the promisee's actions under the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hewitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.