· 10/4/2010
Renchenski v. Williams
Citations
- 622 F.3d 315
- 77 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 937
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 20428
- 2010 WL 3835217
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a prisoner's liberty interest can be violated when severe changes in confinement conditions amount to a grievous loss and are made without notice and a hearing
- concluding that a prisoner’s liberty interest can be violated when severe changes in confinement conditions amount to a grievous loss and are made without notice and a hearing
- concluding that classification of plaintiff “even as a possible sex offender” was stigmatizing
- holding that “mere conclusory allegations” could not 5 support equal protection claim
- finding that due process must be afforded before sex offender conditions may be imposed on an inmate who was not convicted of a sexual offense
- holding that “mere conclusory allegations” could not support equal protection claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fuentes, Aldisert, Roth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.