Skip to main content
· 10/4/2010

Renchenski v. Williams

Citations

  • 622 F.3d 315
  • 77 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 937
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 20428
  • 2010 WL 3835217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a prisoner's liberty interest can be violated when severe changes in confinement conditions amount to a grievous loss and are made without notice and a hearing
  • concluding that a prisoner’s liberty interest can be violated when severe changes in confinement conditions amount to a grievous loss and are made without notice and a hearing
  • concluding that classification of plaintiff “even as a possible sex offender” was stigmatizing
  • holding that “mere conclusory allegations” could not 5 support equal protection claim
  • finding that due process must be afforded before sex offender conditions may be imposed on an inmate who was not convicted of a sexual offense
  • holding that “mere conclusory allegations” could not support equal protection claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuentes, Aldisert, Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.