Renaud v. Sigma-Aldrich Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the discovery rule concerns the discovery that one has suffered an injury, not the discovery of the identity of the party allegedly responsible for causing the injury”
• stating that “the discovery -9- rule concerns the discovery that one has suffered an injury, not the discovery of the identity of the party allegedly responsible for causing the injury”
• examining personal injury claim governed by statute of limitations in G.L. 1956 § 9-1-14
• finding that \[i]n order to toll the running of the statute of limitations . . . there would have to be a showing that . . . the party asserting the statute-of-limitations defense attempted by fraud or misrepresentation to conceal the existence of the cause of action\
• finding that \[i]n order to toll the running of the statute of limitations . . . there would have to be a showing that . . . the party asserting the statute-of-limitations defense attempted by fraud or misrepresentation to conceal the existence of the cause of action\
• upholding three-year limit on injury claims measured from accrual as constitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).