Renaissance Development Corp. v. Zoning Board of Review, 99-5125 (2001)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant would have pleaded guilty because \the value of the evidence of Dookhan's misconduct was outweighed by the benefits of entering into a favorable plea agreement that eliminated potentially ten additional years in prison\
• defendant had to consider that primary test may be admitted in evidence even though confirmatory test by Dookhan inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).