Skip to main content
· 7/18/1914

Remly v. Swanson

Citations

  • 80 Wash. 449
  • 141 P. 899
  • 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1323

Syllabus

<p>Sales—Delivery—Evidence—Sufficiency. Upon an issue as to the delivery of lumber sold, evidence of a witness that he knew the lumber sold had been delivered, although he did not see it delivered, is sufficient to make a prima facie case, in the absence of other evidence.</p> <p>Names—Assumed Names—Certificates—Sufficiency—Statutes —Construction. A certificate as to the assumed name under which plaintiff was doing business complies with Rem. & Bal. Code, § 8369, requiring it to set forth the post office address of the parties interested, where it recites that the plaintiff is engaged in and conducting a general retailing business at Metaline Palls, Pend Oreille county, state of Washington.</p> <p>Same—Assumed Name—Certificate—Sufficiency. A certificate as to the assumed name under which a party was doing business need not give the name of her husband as a party interested, under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 8369, when she was the owner of the business and her husband was merely a manager.</p>

Judges: Main

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.