Remley v. I. C. R. R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[R]emand without vacatur is appropriate where ‘there is at least a serious possibility that the [agency] will be able to substantiate its decision on remand.’”
• “[A]n agency avoids the consultation requirement for a proposed discretionary action only if it determines that its action will have ‘no effect’ on threatened or endangered species or critical habitat.”
• “[A]n agency avoids the consultation requirement for a proposed discretionary action only if it determines that its action will have ‘no effect’ on 3 threatened or ‘endangered’ species or critical habitat”
• vacatur of rule would restore previous rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).