Reminick v. Maltz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that content-neutral regulations are acceptable as long as they are narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest and leave open alternate channels of communication
• reversing only as to appropriate remedy for double jeopardy violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).