Skip to main content
· 9/1/1894

Remington v. Higgins

Citations

  • 6 S.D. 313
  • 60 N.W. 73
  • 1894 S.D. LEXIS 110

Syllabus

<p>1. No special enactment of the territorial legislature, though valid when passed, but in conflict with and obnoxious to a constitutional provision relating to the same subject, survived the adoption of the constitution of this state.</p> <p>2. A special act of the territorial legislature of 1885, authorizing the removal, by a majority vote, of a county seat previously located by the vote, of two-thirds of all the qualified electors of the county, held to be superseded by, because repugnant to, section 3 of the ninth article of the constitution.</p> <p>3. In the absence of a jurisdictional question, the validity of an election by which a county seat was located can only be tested in a direct proceeding. Allegged irregularities cannot be considered and determined collaterally.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.</p>

Judges: Fuller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.