Remington v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts evaluating Rule 60(b) motions must “balance fairness considerations present in a particular case against the policy favoring the finality of judgments”
• dismissing a pro se ADA complaint under Rule 37 for failure to respond to discovery
• “[B]y itself,” “any failing[] attributable to plaintiff’s pro se status” is not “an exceptional circumstance” that justifies “relief under Rule 60(b).” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “To prevail on a Rule 60(b) motion, Plaintiff must demonstrate that one of the criteria outlined in the rule applies.”
• “The Second Circuit has imposed a three-prong test in order for a Rule 60(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).