Skip to main content
· 4/15/1883

Remington Paper Co. v. Dougherty

Citations

  • 36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that school districts had to submit new desegregation plans to conform to the PHRC’s regulation
  • holding that where statute did not define “de facto segregation,” the agency could and did promulgate a legislative regulation that provided a valid and binding definition of the term
  • holding that legislative regulations must be adopted pursuant to proper procedure
  • adopting a “strong deference” standard for reviewing an agency’s interpretation of a statute it is charged to enforce
  • reviewing court is not free to substitute its discretion for that of an administrative agency acting within its statutory powers
  • reviewing court is not free to substitute its discretion for that of an administrative agency acting within its statutory powers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.