Remedial Plan v. Ott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Twombly-Iqbal plausibility threshold applies to allegations of amount in controversy
• concluding that plausibility requirement applies to allegations of amount in controversy
• finding that the plausibility requirement “govern[s] the evaluation of factual allegations that support federal subject matter jurisdiction, such as to evaluate facts alleged concerning an amount in controversy for purposes of federal diversity jurisdiction”
• finding that the Igbal- □ ‘Twombly plausibility requirement “govern|s] the evaluation of factual allegations that support federal subject matter jurisdiction, such as to evaluate facts alleged concerning an amount in controversy for paenosee of federal diversity jurisdiction”
• first citing 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); and then citing Hall v. EarthLink Network, Inc., 396 F.3d 500, 506 (2d Cir. 2005)
• first citing 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); and then citing Hall v. EarthLink Network, Inc., 396 F.3d 500, 506 (2d Cir. 2005)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).