Remco Enterprises, Inc. v. Houston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In determining price unconscionability, there is no fixed ratio limit. The issue is to be determined by the court upon the basis of the peculiar circumstances of each case.”
• a 20-year-old single welfare mother of three with a ninth-grade education who would have had to pay 108% more than a cash customer for a TV on a rental agreement with option to purchase held no violation of the unconscionability section of the KCPA
• a 20-year-old single welfare mother of three with a ninth-grade education who would have had to pay 108% more than a cash customer for a TV on a rental agreement with option to purchase held no violation of the unconscionability section of the KCPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).