Reliance Steel Products Company v. Watson, Ess, Marshall & Enggas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• delivery of legal advice by a non-resident law partnership over the telephone followed by a bill for such services delivered by mail to the client in Pennsylvania found to be insufficient forum-related activity to confer personal jurisdiction
• finding only contacts that are “extensive and persuasive” suffice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).