Skip to main content
· 6/17/2004

Reliance Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Citations

  • 102 F. App'x 539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an order denying a recusal motion is not final or immediately appealable to a district court
  • recognizing that “an order denying a recusal request may not be immediately appealable” (citing City of Pittsburgh v. Simmons, 729 F.2d 953, 954 (3d Cir. 1984))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Fletcher, Roll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.