Skip to main content
· 4/20/1992

Reitz v. Leasing Consultants Associates

Citations

  • 961 F.2d 1441
  • 1992 WL 77647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure of district court to charge jury correctly on allocation of proof requires reversal
  • holding that failure of district court to charge jury correctly on allocation of proof requires reversal
  • circumstantial evi- dence may shift burden if it \directly reflect[s]\ the alleged discriminatory attitude
  • “a plaintiff need not prove the merits of the underlying discrimination complaint, but only that ‘he was acting under a good faith, reasonable belief that a violation existed’ ”
  • “[T]he duty falls on the police and the prosecuting authorities, and not on a private individual supplying information, to determine what are the significant facts in an investigation.”
  • circumstantial evi- dence may shift burden if it \directly reflect[s]\ the alleged discriminatory attitude

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fernandez, Pregerson, Trott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.