Tenth Circuit· 7/28/1989

Reiss v. Hagmann

Citations

881 F.2d 890
1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10874
1989 WL 83154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

citing, Protective Committee for Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. Anderson , 390 U.S. 414 , 424, 434, 88 S.Ct. 1157 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1 (1968)
“A bankruptcy court’s approval of a compromise may be disturbed only when it achieves an unjust result amounting to a clear abuse of discretion.”
A bankruptcy court’s approval of a settlement “may be disturbed only when it achieves an unjust result amounting to a clear abuse of discretion.”
a bankruptcy court’s approval of a settlement “may be disturbed only when it achieves an unjust result amounting to a clear abuse of discretion.”
the decision of a bankruptcy court “to approve the settlement [... ] must be an informed one based upon an objective evaluation of developed facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldock, Logan, Seymour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.