Reinprecht v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ALJ may refuse to issue subpoena under Rule 41 “only when the requested statement is not forthcoming or where it is clearly shown in the statement itself that the solicited testimony would not be material and necessary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hughes v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-08-20· cited 14×
• Cash v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-07-27· cited 12×
• Scheytt v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-08-31· cited 10×
• Benafield v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-07-31· cited 4×
• K Mart Corp. v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-02-16· cited 3×
• Alva v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-03-26· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jones v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-03-22· cited 26×
• Walker Mining Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
  California Court of Appeal· 1939-10-23· cited 24×
• Pauley v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-09-16· cited 10×
• Polston v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-11-04· cited 6×