Reinke v. Wisconsin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s ruling at trial to exclude the testimony by a second expert doctor as cumulative
• “We do want to discourage attorneys from parading additional experts before the court in the hope that the added testimony will improve on some element of the testimony by the principal expert.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).