Reinhart Foodservice LLC v. Bouraxis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that moving party “b[ears] the burden of showing that any of [the Falk ] factors favor[] setting aside the default”
• holding a court’s decision under Rule 55(c) is reviewed for abuse of discretion
• a “mere general denial” regarding the extent of the deficiency owed “is not enough to justify vacating a default or default judgment” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).