Reineke v. Dixon-Woods Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that individualized mitigation defenses could be dealt with through the use of management tools if and when those issues arise
• “[W]hen both experts rely on evidence common to the class, this Court should not resolve which ‘but for’ price is correct.”
• \[I]t is well settled ... that the law does not require every defendant to participate in the conspiracy by identical means throughout the entire class period.\
• “[I]t is well settled . . . that the law does not require every defendant to participate in the conspiracy by identical means throughout the entire class period.”
• “To the extent . . . potential defenses could present some individual issues, there are many ways in which this Court can deal with those issues when they arise.”
• “A class action settlement may ‘prevent class members from subsequently asserting claims relying on a legal theory different from that relied on in the class action complaint, but depending on the very same set of facts.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).