Skip to main content
· 5/15/1974

Reindl v. Opitz

Citations

  • 217 N.W.2d 873
  • 88 S.D. 223
  • 1974 S.D. LEXIS 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that objection to a per diem argument was not properly before the court on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.