· 4/29/1980
Reiman v. Kale
Citations
- 403 N.E.2d 1275
- 83 Ill. App. 3d 773
- 38 Ill. Dec. 671
- 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 2790
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the mere fact that the subdivision plat indicated the presence of streets, which were generally considered public places, was not sufficient to establish donative intent as necessary for a statutory dedication, since there was no general prohibition against private streets
- the mere fact that the subdivision plat indicated the presence of streets, which were generally considered public places, was not sufficient to establish donative intent as necessary for a statutory dedication, since there was no general prohibition against private streets
- the mere fact that the subdivision plat indicated the presence of streets, which were generally considered public places, was not sufficient to establish donative intent as necessary for a statutory dedication, since there was no general prohibition against private streets
- the mere fact that the subdivision plat indicated the presence of streets, which were generally considered public places, was not sufficient to establish donative intent as necessary for a statutory dedication, since there was no general prohibition against private streets
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woodward
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.