Reiman & Co. v. Eromanga Investment, N.V.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it unnecessary to address plaintiff’s alternative argument under the theory of quantum meruit where plaintiff had already prevailed on parallel breach of contract claim
• “In similar matters involving financial transactions, the California 16 Supreme Court and intermediate appellate divisions have found the CLRA applicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).