Skip to main content
· 4/13/2006

Reilly v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Citations

  • 429 F. Supp. 2d 335
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18874
  • 2006 WL 950644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “fact/opinion distinction ‘offers a quick, clear, and predictable rule of decision,’ for most cases”
  • even when information sought under FOIA reveals the inputs of a computer modeling simulation and, thus, some extent of the agency's thought process, the results of that computer modeling are not exempt under the deliberative process exemption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.