Reilly v. Revlon, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a few work-related communications during FMLA leave did not amount to interference, in part because plaintiff was not required to produce any work during her leave
• “[f]ielding occasional calls about one’s job while on leave is a professional courtesy that does not abrogate or interfere with the exercise of an employee’s FMLA rights.”
• rejecting defendants’ argument that plaintiffs interference claim was duplicative of retaliation claim
• dismissing FMLA interference claim in part where temporary replacement called temporary replacement called once or twice to ask, ‘Just where things were in the computer [and] general direction[s] on where to find certain things.’” (citation omitted)
• “Fielding occasional calls about one’s job while on leave is a professional courtesy that does not abrogate or interfere with the exercise 1 Plaintiff does allege that Tuccillo planned to “withdraw[] her pre-approved Paid Time Off (“PTO”
• months-long mental impairment adequately pled to constitute disability that substantially limited work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).