California Supreme Court· 6/29/1882
Reilly v. Reilly
Citations
- 60 Cal. 624
- 1882 Cal. LEXIS 521
Syllabus
<p>Alimony Pending Appeal—Jurisdiction—Supreme Court.—This Court has no jurisdiction to make an order for alimony pending an appeal.</p> <p>Id.—Id.-—Id.—Superior Court.—The power over this matter is vested in the Superior Court, even pending an appeal. The appeal does not take away its jurisdiction, as the matter is not affected by the judgment appealed from.</p>
Judges: Thornton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-03-25· cited 91×
- Shors v. ShorsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1906-12-15· cited 37×
- Prine v. PrineSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-06-15· cited 35×
- Bohnert v. BohnertCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-09-28· cited 32×
- Roby v. RobyIdaho Supreme Court· 1903-12-30· cited 24×
- Duxstad v. DuxstadWyoming Supreme Court· 1908-03-21· cited 15×
- Lewis v. LewisWashington Supreme Court· 1915-01-29· cited 14×
- Holcomb v. HolcombWashington Supreme Court· 1908-05-29· cited 13×
- Kjellander v. KjellanderSupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-06-07· cited 12×
- Rosenfeld v. RosenfeldMissouri Court of Appeals· 1895-11-12· cited 11×
- State ex rel. Shrader v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-06-15· cited 10×
- Ex parte Axtmayer v. PuebloSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1913-04-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.