Reilly v. Office of Personnel Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that this court lacks jurisdiction to review whether the board properly evaluated “particular items of evidence”
• explaining that post-separation medical evidence may be probative of a prior disability when proximity in time, lay testimony, or some other evidence provides the requisite link to the relevant time period
• discussing the history and scope of this court’s review of disability retirement determinations under section 8347(c)
• empha- sizing that “in the rare case where the petitioner alleges that the agency committed legal errors of sufficient gravity, we have jurisdiction to review the [b]oard’s decision”
• “[A]lthough the regulatory scheme and standard on review are different in Social Security cases, the reasoning of these cases also provides support for the general principle that later medical evidence can be relevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).