Reilly v. City of Rome

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a “prerequisite to asserting a 3 || violation of Labor Code section 1102.5 is the existence of an employer-employee 4 || relationship at the time the allegedly retaliatory action occurred”
• declining to apply collateral estoppel where, “in a prior proceeding, a dispositive finding had been made, but only by imposing a lesser burden of proof on the party invoking collateral estoppel than that which would have been applied in the subsequent proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).