Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp. v. Burlington Northern Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the liberal pleading requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a
• “Rule 34(c) itself does not authorize a court to order discovery of nonparty land.”
• \Rule 34(c) itself does not authorize a court to order discovery of nonparty land.\
• case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, however, the court was of the opinion that ancillary jurisdiction may properly be exercised in a discovery action seeking inspection of a nonparty’s land if the facts of a particular case so warrant
• case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, however, the court was of the opinion that ancillary jurisdiction may properly be exercised in a discovery action seeking inspection of a nonparty's land if the facts of a particular case so warrant
• dismissing on the basis of a lack of diversity jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).