Reihmann v. Foerstner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a reasonable person would not feel compelled to resign merely because his employer decided to relocate his office in a neighboring town
• holding that a reasonable person would not feel compelled to resign merely because his employer decided to relocate his office in a neighboring town
• suggesting that the relevant inquiry is not whether a defendant was motivated by an improper purpose but rather whether the methods adopted shock the conscience
• suggesting that the relevant inquiry is not whether a defendant was motivated by an improper purpose but rather whether the methods adopted shock the conscience
• agreeing the record did not contain substantial evidence of outrageous conduct when supervisor used his influence to move plaintiff’s office to a different city
• finding no outrageous conduct when a supervisor used his influence to move the plaintiff’s office to another city

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).