Reigner v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the amount in controversy had not been established where the complaint sought “damages for individual consumers, not disgorgement” (emphasis added)
• explaining that actual and statutory damages under the CPPA are paid to the individual consumer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).