Reigel v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of North Carolina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the correspondence outlining the plaintiffs disability between an ADA plaintiff and her physicians and insurers establishes disability
• holding that alternatives proposed by plaintiff were not reasonable because they eliminated essential functions of job
• “The law does not require an employer to hire two individuals to do the tasks ordinarily assigned to one.”
• plaintiff with shoulder injury who claimed for purposes of receiving disability insurance payments that she was prematurely disabled was estopped from arguing that she was qualified under ADA
• merely stating that the plaintiff failed to meet her burden of proving that she was qualified
• woman who certified to her disability insurer that she could not perform her job was estopped from asserting that during the same time period she had been qualified to perform for purposes of the ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).