Reifer v. Colonial Intermediate Unit 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an employee could not show she was prejudiced because—even if she had received proper notice— she was physically unable to return to work by the end of her FMLA-qualifying leave
• dismissing an FMLA interference claim because the Plaintiff “was unable to perform the essential functions of her job and could not return to work after the protected period provided by the FMLA” and therefore could not show any prejudice from the alleged act of interference
• “It is utterly unreasonable and not within the mandate of the ADA to expect an employer to accommodate an employee with an indefinite leave of absence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).