Reid v. Geico General Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that any failure to provide its insured with written offer of enhanced PIP coverage prior to issuance of the policy, as was required by section 10-4-706(4)(a), C.R.S. 1999 (repealed 2003), was cured “long before [the plaintiff] had her accident”
• upholding sufficiency of offer where policy was purchased over the telephone and subsequent offer was made in writing
• “ Parfrey . . . suggests that we look to the objective reason ableness of [the insurer’s] offer, not the potential purchaser’s subje ctive understanding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).