Skip to main content
· 1/31/2007

Reichler, Milton & Medel v. Republic of Liberia

Citations

  • 484 F. Supp. 2d 1
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7202
  • 2007 WL 1098659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that contracts for legal representation in “major lawsuits” brought in United States courts constituted commercial activity under the FSIA
  • noting that jurisdiction existed “because payment for the legal services was to be made to a banking institution in the United States” and “Liberia’s failure to meet its payment obligation under this contract qualifies as an act that ‘causes a direct effect in the United States’ under the FSIA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.