Reich v. Newspapers of New England, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that erroneous application of the “original and creative” requirement to short test employees was harmless error because those employees also failed to qualify as exempt under the short test
• noting that whether FLSA violation is willful is mixed question of law and fact
• “Overtime is defined as any employment in excess of 40 hours in a single workweek.”
• newspaper writers whose work depends on “intelligence, diligence, and accuracy” are not artistic- professionals, distinguishing such work from that which depends on “invention, imagination, or talent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).