Skip to main content
· 8/17/1994

Reich v. King

Citations

  • 861 F. Supp. 379
  • 18 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1801
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11857
  • 1994 WL 461794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “Defendants’ task is ‘not merely to prove that the investment is prudent, but that there is no risk of large loss resulting from the non-diversification’ ” (quoting Glass/Metal Ass’n, 507 F.Supp. at 384)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nickerson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.