Reiburn v. Segal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the statutory term at issue was unambiguous by reference to surrounding statutory provisions
• concluding that the statutory term at issue was unambiguous by reference to surrounding statutory provisions
• providing that in determining whether language is clear and unambiguous, the court must assess it in the context of the overall statutory scheme, construing all sections with reference to each other, not simply examining language in isolation
• placing onus on requester to properly direct request to open records officer; explaining requester’s obligations to trigger RTKL protections
• rejecting the argument that the statute is ambiguous because \the notion that this language is ambiguous depends upon improperly viewing it in isolation.\
• rejecting the argument that the statute is ambiguous because “the notion that this language is ambiguous depends upon improperly viewing it in isolation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).