Rehwald, P. v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a jury \could have decided\ that a cell phone was a \ 'tool[ ] of the trade' for a drug trafficker\
• noting that “mere knowing presence” is insufficient to establish participation in a conspiracy and reversing conspiracy conviction
• “It is not enough that the defendant merely associated with someone who was knowingly participating in a conspiracy .... ”
• evidence insufficient where defendant drove conspirators to rendezvous and was arrested with a cellular phone and $1,700 in his possession
• “[Defendant] was shown to have been with the conspirators in a car which they drove while making arrangements furthering their drug trafficking, but he was never shown to have heard any of the conversations or participated in any of them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).