· 1/29/2004
Rehm v. Baltimore Storage Co.
Citations
- 300 F. Supp. 2d 408
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1368
- 2004 WL 212395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Carmack Amendment preempted plaintiff’s cause of action for violation of Virginia consumer protection law
- holding that the Carmack Amendment preempts all tort, breach of contract, and state unfair competition claims
- shipper's state-law claim to recover for damage to real property not preempted by the Carmack Amendment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michael
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.