Rehlow v. Schmitt
Citations
- 63 Wash. 666
- 116 P. 267
- 1911 Wash. LEXIS 1262
Syllabus
<p>Pleading — Complaint—Demubbeb. A complaint for the breach of a written contract of employment at a specified sum per month is not subject to a general demurrer for want of sufficient facts to state a cause of action, from the fact that it also alleges a contemporaneous oral agreement to advance expense money, evidence as to which might have been inadmissible as varying the terms of the writing.</p> <p>Appeal — Record—Statement op Pacts — Evidence—Review. An assignment of error in the admission of evidence varying the terms of a written contract will not be considered on appeal where the evidence is not brought up in the record by bill of exceptions or statement of facts, and the judgment might have been sustained by other competent evidence.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that termination of parental rights was supported by evidence and that “[t]he assistance of counsel cannot change the fact that [parent] was convicted of murdering his wife’s father in front of his children . . . .”
- “[The] decision to terminate [parent’s] parental rights was supported by substantial evidence, and the presence of an attorney would not have changed the result of th[e] case.”
- “The assistance of counsel would have “made a determinative difference” at trial. (Internal quotations omitted.) Cf. In re T.L.W., No. 12-10-00401-CV, 2012 WL 1142475, at –3, – 14 (Tex. App.—Tyler no pet.) (mem. op.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.