Rehfeld v. Roth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that any error in applying the Ex parte McLendon , 455 So.2d 863 (Ala. 1984
• stating that any error in applying the Ex parte McLendon , 455 So.2d 863 (Ala. 1984
• explaining that, when a trial court erroneously applies the more stringent standard and denies a modification, the proper approach is to reverse the judgment and remand the cause for the trial court to apply the proper standard
• explaining that, when a trial court erroneously applies the more stringent standard and denies a modification, the proper approach is to reverse the judgment and remand the cause for the trial court to apply the proper standard
• applying Rule 45, Ala. R. App. P., in a case in which the trial court applied the incorrect custody-modification standard
• discussing the Couch and McLendon standards and outlining situations when an appellate court must reverse a trial court's custody judgment on the basis that an incorrect standard was applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).