Skip to main content
· 4/21/1987

Rehabilitation Specialists, Inc. v. Koering

Citations

  • 404 N.W.2d 301
  • 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 4262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that \[w]hether an employee's actions constituted a breach of h[is] duty of loyalty is a question of fact to be determined based on all the circumstances of the case.\
  • stating that “[w]hether an employee’s actions constituted a breach of h[is] duty of loyalty is a question of fact to be determined based on all the circumstances of the case.”
  • stating that the employee’s duty of loyalty prohibits an employee from competing with the employer while still employed
  • stating that the employee’s duty of loyalty prohibits an employee from competing with the employer while still employed
  • noting that duty of loyalty means that an employee may not compete with his employer “while still employed”
  • reversing summary judgment for employee and remanding for determination of whether employee's pre-termination contacts with employer's customers amounted to impermissible solicitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.