Rehab & Community Provider, Aplts v. DHS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a decision is “arbitrary and capricious if [an] agency . . . relie[s] on factors not intended by the legislature”
• noting that regulations are governed by the same general rules of construction that apply to statutes
• noting that administrative regulations are governed by the same rules of construction that apply to statutes
• remanding for “a new EIS determination process in accordance with the standards set forth in this opinion”
• applying the “arbitrary and capricious” standard to review an agency decision under MAPA
• defining an agency ruling as arbitrary and capricious only if the agency “entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem . . . [or] offered an explanation that runs counter to the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).