Regions Bank v. Wingard Properties, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that in an equity case the appellate court will affirm the findings of the trial court unless the appellant can establish that the preponderance of the evidence is against the findings of the trial court
• noting that “[u]njust enrichment is an equitable doctrine”
• \It is well known that equity follows the law.\ (quoting Smith v. Barr, 375 S.C. 157, 164, 650 S.E.2d 486, 490 (Ct. App. 2007))
• \It is well known that equity follows the law.\ (quoting Smith v. Barr, 375 S.C. 157, 164, 650 S.E.2d 486, 490 (Ct. App. 2007))
• \It is well known that equity follows the law.\ (quoting Smith v. Barr, 375 S.C. 157, 164, 650 S.E.2d 486, 490 (Ct. App. 2007))
• \It is well known that equity follows the law.\ (quoting Smith v. Barr, 375 S.C. 157, 164, 650 S.E.2d 486, 490 (Ct. App. 2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).