Reginald Williams v. Catherine Bauman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s confrontation rights were not 42 violated by the admission of preliminary hearing testimony of a witness who died before trial
• holding that the defendant’s confrontation rights were not violated by the admission of preliminary hearing testimony of a witness who died before trial
• holding that the defendant’s confrontation rights were not violated by the admission of preliminary hearing testimony of a witness who died before trial
• explaining that, given a federal court’s limited remedial powers on habeas corpus review, so long as a state court decision on a Confrontation Clause issue leaves “room for reasonable debate,” it must be upheld, “even if it turns out to be wrong”
• explaining that, given a federal court’s limited remedial powers on habeas corpus review, so long as a state court decision on a Confrontation Clause issue leaves “room for reasonable debate,” it must be upheld, “even if it turns out to be wrong”
• denying habeas relief on similar claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).